Description
The torrent sculpin (Cottus rhotheus) is
a freshwater sculpin. Like most cottids, the torrent sculpin is a
benthic species characterized by large, rounded pectoral fins, a
large, flattened head with dorsal eyes, and a body and head
frequently covered with spines or prickles (Moyle and Cech 1996).
The torrent sculpin is gray-brown with black speckling and has a
heavily mottled chin and has two forward-slanting, dark bands on
both sides of its body under the soft, posterior portion of the
dorsal fin. During spawning season, males darken, and the upper
fringe of the anterior dorsal fin turns a bright orange (Troffe
1999). The torrent sculpin is often larger than many other species
of freshwater sculpins, reaching a maximum length of approximately
150 mm (Wydoski and Whitney 2003). Morphological characteristics
that distinguish the torrent sculpin from other sculpin species are
its large head (generally greater than 30 percent of its total body
length), complete lateral line, slender caudal peduncle, strongly
mottled chin, wide mouth (wider than body width at the pectoral
fins, well-developed palatine teeth, and two chin pores (Wydoski and
Whitney 2003; Holton and Johnson 2003).
Distribution
The torrent sculpin is native to the Pacific
Northwest and is found in Washington, Oregon, British Columbia,
Idaho, and Montana. It occurs primarily in tributary systems of the
Columbia River basin, but also occurs in the Fraser River System in
British Columbia, and in coastal streams from Oregon to British
Columbia. In Montana, the torrent sculpin has only been found in
the northwestern part of the state in the Kootenai River drainage
(Brown 1971; Gangemi 1992; Figure 1). Torrent sculpin distribution
appeared to be restricted to tributary streams of the Kootenai River
in close proximity to the main river, although the species was
present at distances greater than 5 km from the main river in
Tobacco River tributaries (Gangemi 1992). Sculpins were formerly
legal live baitfish in Montana, but there is no evidence suggesting
this practice has expanded the range of the torrent sculpin in
Montana (Hendricks 1997). The slimy sculpin C. cognatus is
the only other sculpin species that has been found to co-occur with
the torrent sculpin in Montana (Gangemi 1992). Whereas
interbreeding between the two species is possible, the limited
genetic work that has been conducted has not shown any evidence of
hybridization (Hendricks 1997).

Figure 1.
Torrent sculpin distribution (blue shading) in Montana (Holton and
Johnson 2003).
Ecology and Life History
The torrent sculpin is primarily a lotic species
found in clear, cold streams with swift current, but also occurs to
a lesser extent in rocky shoals of lakes (Holton and Johnson 2003;
Wydoski and Whitney 2003). Lotic torrent sculpin are typically
found in streams greater than 2.4 m wide (Wydoski and Whitney
2003). For example, in northern Idaho, streams with torrent
sculpin averaged 10.4 m wide (Quintela 2004). Like other sculpins,
the torrent sculpin is most frequently found in fast-water habitat
(riffles, runs, and cascades), and less frequently in pools (Finger
1982; Roni 2002; Wydoski and Whitney 2003). Wydoski and Whitney
(2003) reported that torrent sculpin collected from streams on the
Olympic Peninsula in Washington were found in riffles and runs
slightly over 70 percent of the time and in pools just 31 percent of
the time. As a benthic species, the presence of torrent sculpin is
closely associated with substrate composition. It is most abundant
when stable cobble or gravel substrate is available (Finger 1982;
Wydoski and Whitney 2003; Quintela 2004). The species likely uses
the interstices in coarse substrate as cover and as a place to find
food (e.g., Brusven and Rose 1981).
The torrent sculpin feeds predominately on
zooplankton and aquatic insect larvae as a sub-adult; adult diets
also include small fish and fish eggs (Northcote 1954; Brown 1971;
Patten 1971; Pasch and Lyford 1972; Troffe 1999). The torrent
sculpin, with its large mouth and larger overall size, has the
ability to select bigger prey items than other species of freshwater
sculpins (Northcote 1954; Pasch and Lyford 1972; Wydoski and Whitney
2003). In situations where the species is sympatric with another
sculpin species, the ability to select a wider variety of prey sizes
likely offers the torrent sculpin a competitive advantage. Sculpins,
including the torrent sculpin, tend to be prevalent and abundant in
salmonid streams (Bailey 1952; McCleave 1964; Maret and MacCoy
2002), and provide an important food source for many salmonids
(Brown 1971; Wydoski and Whitney 2003).
Torrent sculpin can live as long as six years
and reaches sexual maturity by age two, at approximately 57 mm in
total length (Brown 1971; Wydoski and Whitney 2003). Spawning
occurs in late spring, generally in April and May (Brown 1971;
Thomas 1973; Wydoski and Whitney 2003). Like other freshwater
cottids, the torrent sculpin spawns in nests located under rocks in
swift water (Wydoski and Whitney 2003). The female deposits
adhesive eggs on the underside of an overhanging rock and the male
then fertilizes them (Simon and Brown 1943; Bailey 1952). The
fecundity of female torrent sculpin is a function of body size, with
larger females producing approximately 500 eggs and smaller females
producing far fewer (Troffe 1999; Wydoski and Whitney 2003). After
fertilizing the eggs, male sculpins remain at the nest, attending it
until the young are hatched (Simon and Brown 1943; Bailey 1952;
Mousseau et al. 1987; Bateman and Li 2001; Montana Fish, Wildlife,
and Parks 2005). Torrent sculpin fry may emerge from the nest as
early as August (Northcote 1954; Brown 1971) and presumably like
other cottids, drift and disperse downstream (Sheldon 1968).
Movements of torrent sculpin are poorly
understood. In Washington, torrent sculpin have been documented
moving upstream to spawn from late-January to mid-April, then moving
back downstream, presumably to pre-spawning nodal habitats, after
completion of spawning in May and June (Thomas 1973). The magnitude
of these movements is unknown. Several researchers have found
freshwater sculpins to be rather restricted in their movements
(Bailey 1952; McCleave 1964; Brown and Downhower 1982), with the
farthest recorded movement by a freshwater cottid in North America
being 209 m (Schmetterling and Adams 2004). The relatively
sedentary life history presumed for the torrent sculpin is supported
by limited genetic work that has been conducted in Montana showing
very low heterozygosity (0-0.2%) among analyzed fish (Hendricks
1997).
Status and Threats
The torrent sculpin is currently listed as an
�S3� species of special concern by the state of Montana (Montana
Natural Heritage Program 2004), and is also designated as a
sensitive species by the U.S. Forest Service in Region 1 (Lee et al.
1997). An �S3� designation means that the species in Montana is
potentially at risk because of limited and potentially declining
numbers, extent and-or habitat, even though it may be abundant in
some areas (Montana Natural Heritage Program 2004). The global
ranking of the torrent sculpin is a �G5� meaning that throughout
most of its range it is common, widespread, and abundant (Montana
Natural Heritage Program 2004).
In Montana, the torrent sculpin is likely most
threatened by land use practices that could diminish habitat
quality. Lee et al. (1997) considered sedimentation, increased
water temperature, and pollution as the major potential negative
impacts to the torrent sculpin. Common sources of these impacts
include unregulated livestock grazing, poor logging practices,
mining wastes, irrigation diversions, roads, and urbanization
(Marcus et al. 1990; Meehan 1991). The torrent sculpin is thought
to be intolerant of poor water quality (Maughan and Laumeyer 1974;
Hughes and Gammon 1987; Friesen and Ward 1996; Maret and MacCoy
2002), and is unlikely to persist when faced with high levels of
habitat degradation.
Management
Like all other sculpin species, the torrent
sculpin is classified as a non-game fish species by Montana Fish,
Wildlife and Parks. This classification is based primarily on its
small size and lack of sport or food fish qualities. Although
commercial baitfish harvest is allowed for many non-game fish
species in Montana, the harvest of sculpins for this purpose is no
longer permitted. It is unknown whether the torrent sculpin has
been extirpated from any of its historic range in Montana.
A primary focus of managing the torrent sculpin
in Montana should be to more accurately determine the status of the
species. Efforts should be made to describe its complete range, as
well as to estimate abundance at locations where its presence is
currently known. Populations should be routinely monitored to
describe population trends over time. Additionally, further
research into the life history of the species is also needed. Much
of the life history of the torrent sculpin is poorly understood
(e.g., movement), and is commonly assumed to be similar to that of
other freshwater cottids. The torrent sculpin should also be
protected from habitat degradation and loss by managing land uses,
particularly those that could result in increased sedimentation,
water temperature, or pollution.
Acknowledgements
Reviews of this status report were provided by
David Schmetterling, Paul Hendricks, and Robert Bramblett.
References
Bailey, J. E. 1952. Life history and ecology
of the sculpin Cottus bairdi punctulatus in southwestern
Montana. Copeia 1952:243-255.
Batemen, D. S., and H. W. Li. 2001 Nest site
selection by reticulate sculpin in two streams of different
geologies in the central coast range of Oregon. Transactions of the
American Fisheries Society 130:823-832.
Brown, C. J. D. 1971. Fishes of Montana. Big
Sky Books. Bozeman.
Brown, L., and J. F. Downhower. 1982. Summer
movements of mottled sculpins, Cottus bairdi (Pisces:
Cottidae). Copeia 1982:450-453.
Brusven, M. A., and S. T. Rose. 1981.
Influence of substrate composition and suspended sediment on insect
predation by the torrent sculpin, Cottus rhotheus. Canadian
Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38:1444-1448.
Finger, T. R. 1982. Interactive segregation
among three species of sculpins (Cottus). Copeia
1982:680-694.
Friesen, T. A., and D. L. Ward. 1996. Status
and condition of fish assemblages in streams of the Tualatin River
Basin, Oregon. Northwest Science 70:120-131.
Gangemi, J. T. 1992. Sculpin (Cottus)
distribution in the Kootenai National Forest and western portions of
the Lolo National Forest, Montana. Montana Natural Heritage
Program. Helena.
Hendricks, P. 1997. Status, distribution, and
biology of sculpins (Cottidae) in Montana: a review. Montana
Natural Heritage Program. Helena.
Holton, G. D., and H. E. Johnson. 2003. A
field guide to Montana fishes, Third Edition. Montana Fish,
Wildlife and Parks, Helena.
Hughes, R. M., and J. R. Gammon. 1987.
Longitudinal changes in fish assemblages and water quality in the
Willamette River, Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries
Society 116:196-209.
Lee, D. C., J. R. Sedell, B. E. Rieman, R. F.
Thurow, and J. E. Williams. 1997. Broadscale assessment of aquatic
species and habitats. Pages 1057-1496 in T.M. Quigley and S.
J. Arbelbide, editors. An assessment of ecosystem components in the
interior Colombia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great
Basins, Volume 3. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report
PNW-GTR-405.
Marcus, M. D., M. K. Young, L. E. Noel, and B.
A. Mullan. 1990. Salmonid-habitat relationships in the western
United States: a review and indexed bibliography. U.S. Forest
Service General Technical Report RM-188.
Maret, T. R., and D. E. MacCoy. 2002. Fish
assemblages and environmental variables associated with hard-rock
mining in the Coeur d� Alene River Basin, Idaho. Transactions of
the American Fisheries Society 131:865-884.
Maughan, O. E., and P. H. Laumeyer. 1974.
Further information on the inventory of fishes of Hangman Creek.
Northwest Science 48(3):172-174.
McCleave, J. D. 1964. Movement and population
of the mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdi Girard) in a small
Montana stream. Copeia 1964:506-513.
Meehan, W. R., editor. 1991. Influences of
forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their
habitats. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19,
Bethesda, Maryland.
Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks. 2005.
Animal field guide. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks and Montana
Natural Heritage Program, Helena. Available:
http://fwp.state.mt.us/fieldguide/ (January 2005)
Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2004.
Montana animal species of concern. Montana Natural Heritage
Program and Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena.
Mousseau, T. A., N. C. Collins, and G. Cabana.
1987. A comparative study of sexual selection and reproductive
investment in the slimy sculpin, Cottus cognatus. Oikos
51:156-162.
Moyle, P. B., and J. J. Cech, Jr. 1996.
Fishes: An introduction to ichthyology, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall,
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Northcote, T. G. 1954. Observations on the
comparative ecology of two species of fish, Cottus asper and
Cottus rhotheus, in British Columbia. Copeia 1954:25-28.
Pasch, R. W., and J. H. Lyford, Jr. 1972. The
food habits of two species of Cottus occupying the same
habitat. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
101:377-381.
Patten, B. G. 1971. Increased predation by the
torrent sculpin, Cottus rhotheus, on coho salmon fry,
Oncorhynchus kisutch, during moonlight nights. Journal of the
Fisheries Research Board of Canada 28:1352-1354.
Quintela, J. G. 2004. Habitat variables
affecting the distribution and density of torrent sculpin (Cottus
rhotheus) in northern Idaho. Master�s thesis. University of
Idaho, Moscow.
Roni, P. 2002. Habitat use by fishes and
Pacific giant salamanders in small western Oregon and Washington
streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
131:743-761.
Schmetterling, D. A., and S. B. Adams. 2004.
Summer movements within the fish community of a small montane
stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management
24:1163-1172.
Sheldon, A. L. 1968. Drift, growth, and
mortality of juvenile sculpins in Sagehen Creek, California.
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 97:495-496.
Simon, J. R., and R. C. Brown. 1943.
Observations on the spawning of the sculpin, Cottus semiscaber.
Copeia 1943:41-42.
Thomas, A. E. 1973. Spawning migration and
intragravel movement of the torrent sculpin, Cottus rhotheus.
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 102:620-622.
Troffe, P. M. 1999. Distribution of sculpins
in the Columbia Basin. Living Landscapes, Royal British Columbia
Museum. Available: http://www.livinglandscapes.bc.ca/cbasin/peter_myles/nat_cottidae.html.
(January 2005).
Wydoski, R. S., and R. R. Whitney. 2003.
Inland fishes of Washington, 2nd edition. American
Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland and University of Washington
Press, Seattle.
Back
to Species of Special Concern page

|